NHacker Next
  • new
  • past
  • show
  • ask
  • show
  • jobs
  • submit
Show HN: Quibbler – A critic for your coding agent that learns what you want (github.com)
p0w3n3d 11 hours ago [-]
In other words, the Quibbler siphons wrackspurts away from your code.
agarttha 1 hours ago [-]
Replace the middle manager
janpio 9 hours ago [-]
The demo video in the GH page didn't work for me, but there is also one on Twitter/X: https://xcancel.com/fulcrumML/status/1984054489851310191
nberkman 5 hours ago [-]
Submitted a PR with AWS Bedrock support: https://github.com/fulcrumresearch/quibbler/pull/5/files (credits!)
gexla 15 hours ago [-]
More explanation here that I found by Googling around. Though not sure it has more info than the Github page.

https://fulcrumresearch.ai/2025/10/22/introducing-orchestra-...

balleddog 10 hours ago [-]
Is an anthropic api key really necessary? A major roadblock for taking a test drive. Already have a Claud Max subscription but an anthropic api key still need at least 5$/mon extra.
epiccoleman 4 hours ago [-]
I really want Anthropic to let me make an API token that pulls from the same pool of usage that my Pro subscription does with the official clients. It would be cool to be able to run experiments with alternate clients and automation and stuff without having to go swipe the card at the ol' API token refilling station.
asn0 8 hours ago [-]
You could use the prompts in the code to create a Claude Code sub-agent[1], which would do the same thing without an API key

1. https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/claude-code/sub-agents

thenthenthen 9 hours ago [-]
Sounds like video streaming services…
selfawareMammal 11 hours ago [-]
An agent's agent?
oneandonley1 5 hours ago [-]
Sounds like a wip to me, "do it better or get punished"
hikarudo 10 hours ago [-]
A gentleman's gentleman!
mouse_ 7 hours ago [-]
There's so many agents to handle my agents, I'm gonna need agents for my agent agents soon.
etherio 15 hours ago [-]
hey HN! happy to answer any questions

this kind of tool is especially useful in longer running tasks to enforce your intent without having to check in on your agent all the time

anonymous908213 14 hours ago [-]
Can users stack Quibblers, so Quibbler 2 corrects Quibbler 1 if, say, it fabricates an issue in the code it's reviewing? If so, have you found an optimum number of Quibblers for the Quibbler stack? Also, might users form a Quibbler council such that multiple Quibblers review the same thing and form a consensus before proceeding?
Balinares 11 hours ago [-]
I love the pixel-perfect precision with which this comment is straddling the Poe's Law line.

That aside I also love the concept of Quibbler Council and I'd get a kick out of seeing it in action.

sheepscreek 6 hours ago [-]
MoQs - Mixture of Quibblers? Would be convenient to have them run on dedicated FGPAs. Then they can facilitate near real-time quibbing at the network level across all packets.
anonymous908213 14 hours ago [-]
But who polices the vibe police?
Brajeshwar 13 hours ago [-]
“Well, who’s gonna monitor the monitors of the monitors?” — Enemy of the State (Movie)
qq66 14 hours ago [-]
> We’ve found Quibbler useful in preventing agents from: 1) fabricating results without running commands

What a world we've created for ourselves

N_Lens 12 hours ago [-]
Next step is critics for the critics.
CoastalCoder 8 hours ago [-]
Until they reach critical mass.
18 hours ago [-]
cjonas 15 hours ago [-]
Vibeception
Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact
Rendered at 18:56:41 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.