@criomsoneer: Check out Open Science Network (Bonfire), they are also doing interesting work in this space! https://openscience.network/
gnarlouse 6 hours ago [-]
Integrate them peer review process and you’ve got a disrupter
mlpoknbji 5 hours ago [-]
Peer review should be disrupted, but doing peer review via social media is not the way to go.
perching_aix 4 hours ago [-]
Has a bit of a leg up in that if it's only academics commenting, it would probably be way more usable than typical social media, maybe even outright good.
crimsoneer 6 hours ago [-]
Right? This is kind of the dream.
naasking 5 hours ago [-]
Calling it peer review suggests gatekeeping. I suggest no gatekeepind just let any academic post a review, and maybe upvote/downvote and let crowdsourcing handle the rest.
staplers 5 hours ago [-]
While I appreciate no gatekeeping, the other side of the coin is gatekeeping via bots (vote manipulation).
Something like rotten tomatoes could be useful. Have a list of "verified" users (critic score) in a separate voting column as anon users (audience score).
This will often serve useful in highly controversial situations to parse common narratives.
11101010010001 3 hours ago [-]
Yes publishing is broken, but academics are the last people to jump onto platforms...they never left email. If you want to change the publishing game, turn publishing into email.
Rendered at 00:26:25 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
If not, same handle over there, I can get you in touch with them. Or hit up Boris, he knows everyone and is happy to make connections
There's also a full day at the upcoming conference on ATProto & scientific related things. I think they com on discourse more (?)
That'll get us connected off HN
I think Cosmik is the group I was thinking of that has also put out some initial poc like yourself
https://discourse.atprotocol.community/t/about-the-atproto-s...
Something like rotten tomatoes could be useful. Have a list of "verified" users (critic score) in a separate voting column as anon users (audience score).
This will often serve useful in highly controversial situations to parse common narratives.