I’d encourage a change of labels away from “friend/foe”. It may seem minor but the subtle loaded nature of those paired terms encourages an adversarial stance rather than one of productive discourse. It’s not catchy so there’s probably better than this but, just as an example— “engage/ignore” could better signal to the user a neutral “do I want to bother with this person?”
logicprog 2 hours ago [-]
Agreed, independent of where the terminology came from, I think if you're trying to promote healthier engagement both for yourself and others using this extension, then not having such adversarial names it's probably a good idea. It should just end up being a sort of web of trust to help you decide what's worth engaging with — and sometimes perfectly valid people that you're not actually enemies with or anything just aren't worth your time engaging with because of fundamental axiological or positional differences.
jacquesm 3 hours ago [-]
That's just Slashdot's influence. They did the same thing at some point.
ineedasername 2 hours ago [-]
Ah, okay-- though that doesn't mean the author can't do better, if I'm not just being too nitpicky.
jacquesm 1 hours ago [-]
The last thing HN needs is to become more like Slashdot.
Lerc 58 minutes ago [-]
Dot product of opinions? Using a fancier term for the same thing might be a significant axis though.
ting0 44 minutes ago [-]
That's such a friend thing to say!
WorldMaker 58 minutes ago [-]
Follow/Distance?
wartywhoa23 45 minutes ago [-]
Arian/Non-Arian
45 minutes ago [-]
rustystump 1 hours ago [-]
I like friend and foe far more than engage and ignore. A foe isnt someone you ignore. Ignoring is what builds bubbles. A foe can often be right even if you disagree.
XorNot 41 minutes ago [-]
People I want to ignore I usually disagree with as well, but that's not the problem: the problem is they are repetitive and boring.
zzo38computer 7 minutes ago [-]
I would prefer to do the opposite, where everything is displayed in chronological order (with an option to display by threads or not; even if not you can still find what each one is a reply to) regardless of voting and regardless of who wrote them.
scrumper 3 hours ago [-]
I wonder what the second order effects of this on the HN karma system will be. It'll create a graph of karmic supernodes perhaps. Say I green-blob someone with a big reputation here, say jacquesm; no doubt lots of other people will do the same. The friends-of-friends icon is going to appear widely but it'll all be a single edge away from Jacques' node. Is that much of a signal? I dunno. That's 30 seconds of thought about it. It's a fun idea though so I'll try it.
Version two: hide foes? Come to think of it, maybe the 'foe' aspect is the fun part...
EDIT: it's like I summoned him.
cousinbryce 1 hours ago [-]
Pagerank
drcongo 2 hours ago [-]
everybody loves jacquesm
2 hours ago [-]
omoikane 3 hours ago [-]
Related, there is already an extension that allows selected users to be highlighted, but without the shared server data for computing friend-of-a-friend relationships:
A question, per your final comment on being available to answer questions:
What do you feel is the benefit to the community for this that isn't offered by native blocking/existing extensions?
I ask not out of malice, I ask because 2 reasons:
1. I imagine spending time on this/it's working well required you to see the value/benefit to it.
2. We must assume all hacker news commenting follows the rules, IE; good faith comment with relevant experience when required. This seems like a way to promote getting around that.
chatmasta 39 minutes ago [-]
> that isn't offered by native blocking/existing extensions
There is no “native blocking” on HN. You cannot block a user or hide their comments and submissions in perpetuity. You can only hide on a per-story basis.
How old is that icon set? I swear I used that same peppers icon for a Windows app that I published around 2002.
cousinbryce 1 hours ago [-]
Way down on my list of projects to vibe code is tags for HN users. I.e `Elon Stan` , `smart about aeronautics` , `grumpy` , `reasonable` etc etc. I like reading different opinion but if I formed an opinion about a user id like to record that without using my brain
ddtaylor 1 hours ago [-]
I created and shared Ethos which is a sentiment and discourse analysis thing for HN and it's been plugging away. You're welcome to use its API if you want. Submit a PR for the CORS to be changed as needed.
I have a text file of commentors I normally disagree with and check in on them from time to time (about weekly). Its good fun and often I find there will be topics I do agree with them on. Reading the same opinions all the time is no fun.
ZpJuUuNaQ5 2 hours ago [-]
Interesting. I'd love to have a browser extension that automatically blocks all comment sections on every site I visit, so I wouldn't feel the need to interact with anyone online.
Installed! Lets see how this goes. I'm going through previous interactions I've had with people.
logicprog 2 hours ago [-]
Hmm, I installed this in Waterfox for Android, and I don't appear to be able to tap on the bubbles next to people's usernames
3 hours ago [-]
Retr0id 2 hours ago [-]
It'd be interesting to run pagerank over the trust graph
ImPostingOnHN 2 hours ago [-]
this seems like it would increase tribalism and polarization
subdavis 2 hours ago [-]
Indeed. Why engage with ideas on the merits when you can color (literally) your own opinion of them before even reading.
I guess if you just prefer wearing horse blinders?
SV_BubbleTime 3 hours ago [-]
I would suggest categorizing the quality of comments by its content and not its creator. Oh, nevermind, that’s a silly thought.
Challenge my core belief? Well… I could rationally evaluate that, or, I could just use a tool to block it from my vision! Bubble thickener.
netsharc 2 hours ago [-]
There are some trolls in here that seemingly evade getting banned despite their moronic comments...
Also, many comments just take a wrong premise and attack you (e.g. that not wanting the slaughter of innocent people equals supporting terrorists who want to slaughter innocent people). They don't offer anything more than that, so that IMO taking the time to consider their mostly one-note opinion is just wasting said time.
tomhow 2 hours ago [-]
> There are some trolls in here that seemingly evade getting banned despite their moronic comments...
As moderators we can only judge comments according to the guidelines, and can only ban accounts if they repeatedly breach them. You're always welcome to email us (hn@ycombinator.com) about an account that has been continually breaching the guidelines.
XorNot 38 minutes ago [-]
I think that's the point though? Plenty of things not worth engaging with also aren't technically violating any rules: but wasting the brainpower on them also isn't worth it in a reliable way.
That's where an ignore system is useful.
ddtaylor 1 hours ago [-]
I have emailed HN before when I spot really terrible things and they have been quick to effect change.
kmeisthax 1 hours ago [-]
There are enough bad-faith commenters on HN that I personally would find this very useful.
jonathanstrange 2 hours ago [-]
That's weird, I'm reading HN every day and never felt a need for something like that. In my experience, the quality of comments is very high and really bad ones tend to be downvoted or flagged fast. Could this be a time zone issue such that people in certain time zones are less fortunate than others?
alt187 1 hours ago [-]
"Less fortunate" is a generous wording and framing.
goodpoint 2 hours ago [-]
what about privacy?
Retr0id 2 hours ago [-]
It would appear that friend/foe lists are entirely public (the latter feels a bit rude)
elcapitan 2 hours ago [-]
Finally someone brings this place the explicit toxicity it had been missing all those years. /s
slopinthebag 2 hours ago [-]
[flagged]
Rendered at 21:10:54 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
Version two: hide foes? Come to think of it, maybe the 'foe' aspect is the fun part...
EDIT: it's like I summoned him.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17717598
What do you feel is the benefit to the community for this that isn't offered by native blocking/existing extensions?
I ask not out of malice, I ask because 2 reasons: 1. I imagine spending time on this/it's working well required you to see the value/benefit to it. 2. We must assume all hacker news commenting follows the rules, IE; good faith comment with relevant experience when required. This seems like a way to promote getting around that.
There is no “native blocking” on HN. You cannot block a user or hide their comments and submissions in perpetuity. You can only hide on a per-story basis.
How old is that icon set? I swear I used that same peppers icon for a Windows app that I published around 2002.
Original post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46993774
https://rickyromero.com/shutup/
I guess if you just prefer wearing horse blinders?
Challenge my core belief? Well… I could rationally evaluate that, or, I could just use a tool to block it from my vision! Bubble thickener.
Also, many comments just take a wrong premise and attack you (e.g. that not wanting the slaughter of innocent people equals supporting terrorists who want to slaughter innocent people). They don't offer anything more than that, so that IMO taking the time to consider their mostly one-note opinion is just wasting said time.
As moderators we can only judge comments according to the guidelines, and can only ban accounts if they repeatedly breach them. You're always welcome to email us (hn@ycombinator.com) about an account that has been continually breaching the guidelines.
That's where an ignore system is useful.