Soon, we'll start seeing Claude certs getting listed on LinkedIn alongside Coursera courses.
People with titles like
Giga Chad, MBA, CSS, CKAD, XXX, PQRS
are gonna love this.
In no time, HRs will start slapping “10 years of certified Claude Code experience required” on job listings.
neonstatic 4 hours ago [-]
_Open to Claude_ ;)
deadbabe 3 hours ago [-]
it’s crazy how you could easily lie about having 10 years experience because your results are not that much different from someone who has only used Claude Code for like a week.
felipeerias 10 minutes ago [-]
The obvious solution is for Anthropic et al. to certify the skills of each user:
> “Good at explaining requirements, needs handholding to understand complex algorithms, picky with the text of comments, slightly higher than average number of tokens per feature.”
I’m not saying this would be good at all, but the data (/insights) and the opportunity are clearly there.
CGamesPlay 3 hours ago [-]
I hope it’s at least a little tricky, since Claude was released only 3 years ago. That said, I would not be surprised to see companies asking for 10 years experience, despite that inconvenient truth.
conductr 2 hours ago [-]
I’ve seen it play out multiple times, highlights precisely why a candidate should never withhold their application based on preference of years of experience with anything. They simply haven’t put much thought into those numbers.
deadbabe 3 hours ago [-]
If you work on 10 projects in parallel for a year using Claude code… you have the equivalent of 10 years of experience in 1 year.
ipaddr 3 hours ago [-]
No you would have ten projects finished. You would have less than a year of actually programming experience.
weird-eye-issue 2 hours ago [-]
That's not how it works...
_aavaa_ 2 hours ago [-]
If you can add more people to finish a project faster, I can add more projects to get experience faster.
weird-eye-issue 2 hours ago [-]
I actually prefer removing people
AvAn12 3 hours ago [-]
Isn’t this sort of like saying you know how to use a web browser?
what 2 hours ago [-]
Maybe? My high school had typing classes and on word and spread sheets and whatever. They also had dental assistant program where you’d be certified by the time you graduate high school.
kstenerud 1 hours ago [-]
This is very likely a defensive move to help build pressure against Trump designating them a supply chain risk (aka corporate death sentence). The more embedded they become in large organizations, and the more authoritative they become in certification, the harder it is for the government to kill their company.
fangorn 1 hours ago [-]
The hilarious question is: will you fail the AI certification for using AI during the exam? What if it's a competing AI?
4 hours ago [-]
rishabhaiover 7 hours ago [-]
Naive question but do people really value certifications like these?
nlawalker 5 hours ago [-]
As a consumer of them, I love them: a company with an influential, widely-used technology or platform spends a ton of money signaling to the industry exactly what's important to know about it, creating training curriculum for it, and a whole infrastructure to verify when someone knows it, I'm going to take them up on all of that, especially in the cases where the investment is like $100, a little bit of studying (the likes of which I'd want to do anyway if I'm learning something new, and I'm happy to have their structured, prioritized list of topics and/or guided curriculum) and a couple hours taking an online-proctored exam. From that perspective, I don't have a good reason not to have a certification in something that's super relevant to my role.
In interview/hiring situations where they're not expected or effectively required, they make for great chat fodder and a really good opportunity to exhibit awareness about yourself, the industry, and how the person on the other side of the table might perceive certifications given the context.
laborcontract 5 hours ago [-]
God I hatelove this type of comment. You're totally right, but it's a complete repudiation of my initial reflex, which is to make a mockery of this.
Great perspective. I'm going to do this. Haha.
cebert 6 hours ago [-]
Unfortunately some business leads value these types of certifications and partner programs. I imagine there’s a great deal of overlap with these folks and those who use Gartner’s Magic Quadrant for purchasing decisions.
3rodents 6 hours ago [-]
Most employees at most businesses show up do as they are trained and then go home, because that is what is asked of them. Even those who might have the inclination to explore new technology often will not for fear of doing something wrong. And that creates a big market for training: a company wants their employees to use Claude so the employees must be trained.
Startups / technology companies that expect employees to be self-starters who can be set free to frolic amongst the problems are an aberration.
neya 2 hours ago [-]
Think of these like the Google cloud or AWS certifications. A few companies that specialize in them will want you to have them. But for the rest of the industry, your ability to ace the technical interview will matter more.
KiranRao0 7 hours ago [-]
My naive guess is that business with no tech component hire consultants, and these are part of the sales pitch.
Or governments/large organizations performing box checking exercises
skippyboxedhero 5 hours ago [-]
Consultancies do. Deloitte are quoted on the page. Consultancy people at my place of work have all been "AI trained".
Doesn't stop them being useless though, like giving an electric drill to a chimp and telling them to build a house...lots of action, a lot of screeching, not much work.
One of the mistakes with AI is that people believe it will turn lead into gold: if you give AI bad prompts, AI will produce bad work.
abirch 5 hours ago [-]
Consultancies sell the resume and not the person. It's easier for them to quantify, "We have 300 CCAs" than it is "What have this person Kim who is really good."
Covenant0028 4 hours ago [-]
Yes, because if that was their sales pitch, they would need to pay Kim more, and they would have to account for the fact that she's already allocated elsewhere. It's better to pretend all those CCAs are interchangeable.
throwawaytea 5 hours ago [-]
If you give bad prompts to humans it produces bad work too.
SpicyLemonZest 7 hours ago [-]
They do. Certifications make technical expertise legible to non-technical decisionmakers, and I've encountered people on both sides of that dynamic who affirmatively like it when companies set up programs like this. Obviously you and I would rather have someone who understands Claude make decisions about whether and how to use it, but in a lot of industries that's not realistic.
MattGaiser 7 hours ago [-]
Non-technicals do.
101008 6 hours ago [-]
Imagine being so close to build AGI and erase software engineer in the next 6 months, that you need to throw $100M to build a certification program...
6 hours ago [-]
colesantiago 6 hours ago [-]
The Suits, HR and execs would love this:
"Must have a degree or certification in Claude."
"Must hold an OpenClaw 2026 Grade II Certificate"
skybrian 7 hours ago [-]
I wonder who the audience is for an announcement about spending a lot of money on something vague?
alephnerd 7 hours ago [-]
> who the audience is...
Businesses that are already in conversations about building partnerships and training with Anthropic.
The real revenue that foundation model companies like Anthropic, OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and others generate comes from enterprise deals with a smattering of government - not consumer.
Consumer usage is largely a loss leader used as a training/refining tool, and it's best to view the economics of foundational model providers through the same lens you would a hyperscaler.
A major component to AWS's rise was the ecosystem built around training and teaching how to use the AWS ecosystem thanks to the AWS certification program. Same for K8s via the Linux Foundation.
By building a partnership and training motion, Anthropic can get the WITCHes, Deloittes, PWCs, Accentures, KPMGs, and others to start offering turnkey services, which is why Anthropic has been working on building co-sell relationships with those kinds of companies.
deadbabe 3 hours ago [-]
I think it’s pretty clear what the purpose of this stuff is: get people so invested into the Claude ecosystem with certs and “modernization kits”, so that when the subsidies end and subscription costs shoot up they feel they’re in too deep now to switch to something cheaper.
ImaCake 1 hours ago [-]
Or what if local models get good enough to threaten the server based product?
ares623 2 hours ago [-]
I'm getting mixed signals. I thought these things are so magical that anyone can use them?
codaphiliac 6 hours ago [-]
watching all agile coaches turn into claude experts in 3 2 1 …
jamesvnz 2 hours ago [-]
You joke, but that does seem to be happening from what I've seen - Agile Coaches are rebranding to become "AI coaches" or "AI Enablers".
scuff3d 2 hours ago [-]
Figures, gotta keep that grift going somehow...
peterweisz 7 hours ago [-]
Would be grateful for a pointer on how to sign up to this.
Uhh.. Deloitte and Accenture.. not exactly what I would call a good partner here unless you are looking for name recognition at executive level. Is that all that it is?
clpm4j 6 hours ago [-]
It's part of enterprise sales which is how Anthropic will potentially be a long-term business.
pempem 6 hours ago [-]
Who purchases and greenlights adoption? These cycles are very long and partnering with consulting firms gets you cross industry access.
In fact, if you look at basically every major AI/LLM player you'll see a similar "alliance" or "partnership". Its a sales channel of high end referrals.
greatgib 5 hours ago [-]
Such a joke to advertise Claude as a tool to work on corporate technical debt when it is definitively the thing that will increase it a lot.
And let's not even discuss the vacuity of their new cash machine certifications. "Architect" come on...
scuff3d 2 hours ago [-]
We're 6 months away from some company's app/infrastructure/whatever going down and staying down, because literally nobody knows how the 500,000 line code base works and Claude is stuck in a loop.
rednafi 4 hours ago [-]
Shhh...you're only supposed to unilaterally praise it to get along with your clueless leadership.
heliumtera 3 hours ago [-]
The same is true for every other strategy to avoid technical debt.
It is bullshit all the way down.
aplomb1026 6 hours ago [-]
[dead]
Rendered at 05:35:08 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
People with titles like
Giga Chad, MBA, CSS, CKAD, XXX, PQRS
are gonna love this.
In no time, HRs will start slapping “10 years of certified Claude Code experience required” on job listings.
> “Good at explaining requirements, needs handholding to understand complex algorithms, picky with the text of comments, slightly higher than average number of tokens per feature.”
I’m not saying this would be good at all, but the data (/insights) and the opportunity are clearly there.
In interview/hiring situations where they're not expected or effectively required, they make for great chat fodder and a really good opportunity to exhibit awareness about yourself, the industry, and how the person on the other side of the table might perceive certifications given the context.
Great perspective. I'm going to do this. Haha.
Startups / technology companies that expect employees to be self-starters who can be set free to frolic amongst the problems are an aberration.
Or governments/large organizations performing box checking exercises
Doesn't stop them being useless though, like giving an electric drill to a chimp and telling them to build a house...lots of action, a lot of screeching, not much work.
One of the mistakes with AI is that people believe it will turn lead into gold: if you give AI bad prompts, AI will produce bad work.
"Must have a degree or certification in Claude."
"Must hold an OpenClaw 2026 Grade II Certificate"
Businesses that are already in conversations about building partnerships and training with Anthropic.
The real revenue that foundation model companies like Anthropic, OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and others generate comes from enterprise deals with a smattering of government - not consumer.
Consumer usage is largely a loss leader used as a training/refining tool, and it's best to view the economics of foundational model providers through the same lens you would a hyperscaler.
A major component to AWS's rise was the ecosystem built around training and teaching how to use the AWS ecosystem thanks to the AWS certification program. Same for K8s via the Linux Foundation.
By building a partnership and training motion, Anthropic can get the WITCHes, Deloittes, PWCs, Accentures, KPMGs, and others to start offering turnkey services, which is why Anthropic has been working on building co-sell relationships with those kinds of companies.
Linked from here: https://claude.com/partners
In fact, if you look at basically every major AI/LLM player you'll see a similar "alliance" or "partnership". Its a sales channel of high end referrals.
And let's not even discuss the vacuity of their new cash machine certifications. "Architect" come on...
It is bullshit all the way down.