I'm puzzled by Espressif's naming here. We had the ESP32-S3, so "S31" sounds like "S3, variant 1," but this part doesn't really look like a simple S3 variant. And then there's an ESP32-E22, but no E21 or even a plain E2 anywhere.
It reminds me a bit of the new STM32s (STM32MP2) which are actually 64 bit, but they kept the name STM32 because everyone knows it
beng-nl 46 minutes ago [-]
Didn’t Intel also try to brand the 64bit x86 extensions as ia-32e initially? Seemed like wasting an opportunity to me.
(Disclaimer: I work at Intel but this was way before my tenure.)
p_l 36 minutes ago [-]
It was because IA-64 was a completely different unrelated architecture that until AMD succeeded with K8 was "the plan" for both 64bit intel roadmap and the roadmap to kill off compatible vendors (AMD, VIA)
urba_ 15 minutes ago [-]
I don’t trust Espressif’s releases, I am still waiting for ESP32-P4 to hit distributors.
It is now more than 2 years and 3rd chip revision
They claim that the chip has an "MMU". But unfortunately this doesn't seem to be a true RISC-V MMU (according to the Sv32 specification) integrated into the CPU core itself, but just a peripheral designed for memory mapped SPI flash and PSRAM. So as far as I understand there is no true process isolation with page faults and dynamic paging.
volemo 21 minutes ago [-]
That’s a shame, it’d be a cool and, afaik, unique feature for this niche.
Rochus 33 seconds ago [-]
Maybe Espressif will notice that there are no RV32 chips with MMU so far (at least to my knowledge); we only have 32 MCUs or then only 64 bits for the CPUs. Something like Cortex-A7 is missing.
moepstar 2 hours ago [-]
I believe this is the first ESP to gain Ethernet capability?
I totally wish that a board would come with PoE…
Because as it is right now, powering a fleet of those with USB power supplies is annoying as fsck…
elcritch 2 hours ago [-]
Nah, ESP32's have had ethernet capability for a while and ESP-IDF supports it well. I've been using one I built for 5+ years now. Unfortunately RMII (ethernet phy) interface takes up a lot of the GPIO pins. This part looks like it'll remedy that issue.
There's two ESP32 boards that have been around for a while with PoE:
> Because as it is right now, powering a fleet of those with USB power supplies is annoying as fsck…
Therefore, wifi is more convenient than ethernet.
You don't need long cables, just a local power source.
52 minutes ago [-]
Geof25 2 hours ago [-]
The original ESP32 has Ethernet as well, I believe in the form of RMII. Then it has been removed from the chip, never specified the reason.
3form 2 hours ago [-]
This would be great indeed.
On that note, why does the PoE capability often add such a big proportion of the price of various items? Is the technology really costly for some reason, or is it just more there's fairly low demand and people are still willing to pay?
jwr 2 hours ago [-]
PoE is not obvious to implement (take it from someone who has done it with a fair share of mistakes), uses more expensive components that normal ethernet, takes up more space on the board, makes passing emissions certification more complex, and is more prone to mistakes that ruin boards in the future, causing support/warranty issues. In other words, a bag of worms: not impossible to handle, but something you would rather avoid if possible.
ldng 45 minutes ago [-]
And what would a better alternative look like ?
throwup238 58 minutes ago [-]
Ethernet is already one of the most expensive standards because you need magnetics for isolation. Adding power on top of that is genuinely expensive.
easygenes 1 hours ago [-]
A full-module add-on in this power class is about $7 at 1,000 unit scale [0]. It would be around $3 with your own custom PCB design in terms of BoM addon at scale. That’s power only. Add another dollar or two for 10/100 PHY.
The trick is as others have said in what adding it to your design does in terms of complicating compliance design.
Whenever you combine two things into one, the complexity and cost go up considerably. A regular coffee machine is pretty cheap. Add high pressure so it can make espresso and it gets considerably more expensive. Add milk so it can make cappuccino, again more complex and expensive. The same holds for electronics. Isolating power when it's alone is fairly straightforward. It gets considerably more tricky and hence more expensive the moment you want to place any kind of a meaningful data signal in its vicinity.
solarkraft 1 hours ago [-]
I’m sure the other commenters are right, but I’m guessing market segmentation may play a role here too.
volemo 21 minutes ago [-]
How do Espressif’s RISC-V cores compare to existing ARM or RISC-V options in terms of power efficiency (computational power / electrical power)?
amelius 7 minutes ago [-]
Does it run Linux?
ricardobeat 49 minutes ago [-]
I hope this one has multiple radios so you can actually use BT/Wifi/Thread simultaneously.
bestouff 2 hours ago [-]
Is there something that match those elsewhere ?
wosined 1 hours ago [-]
The ESP32 boards I own have bad support and are a bit of a hit and miss. (arduino nano esp32) Did this get better? Or is the support still messy?
mianos 10 minutes ago [-]
That native sdk and the vscode plugin are very professional. There is a bit of a learning curve to get into it, but once you do, it's very functional and the developers are super supportive. They have fixed bugs for me in days.
ricardobeat 47 minutes ago [-]
Arduino nano are made by arduino using Espressif chips, and Arduino IDE support is indeed hit and miss.
ESP-IDF, the official C SDK, is a bit more work, and there is drama around platform-io, but it’s significantly more stable.
logicallee 2 hours ago [-]
Roughly how much do you think this costs?
ricardobeat 44 minutes ago [-]
Given their history, I would guess <$6 a piece for a dev board, <$2 for the chip at scale.
Rendered at 10:47:35 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
Edit: found an article explaining some of their naming logic, and said that the SoC naming will get its follow-up article, but sadly it never happened. https://developer.espressif.com/blog/2025/03/espressif-part-...
(Disclaimer: I work at Intel but this was way before my tenure.)
I totally wish that a board would come with PoE…
Because as it is right now, powering a fleet of those with USB power supplies is annoying as fsck…
There's two ESP32 boards that have been around for a while with PoE:
- https://www.tme.com/us/en-us/details/esp32-poe/development-k... - https://wesp32.com/
I'm more hopeful for single-pair ethernet to gain momentum though! Deterministic, faster than CANBUS, single pair, with power delivery:
https://www.hackster.io/rahulkhanna/sustainable-real-time-la...
Therefore, wifi is more convenient than ethernet.
You don't need long cables, just a local power source.
On that note, why does the PoE capability often add such a big proportion of the price of various items? Is the technology really costly for some reason, or is it just more there's fairly low demand and people are still willing to pay?
The trick is as others have said in what adding it to your design does in terms of complicating compliance design.
[0] https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/silvertel/AG9705-...
ESP-IDF, the official C SDK, is a bit more work, and there is drama around platform-io, but it’s significantly more stable.