Replicated association, which is strong, but not proof. Initial study saw a 3.5% absolute reduction in dementia diagnoses over seven years with a very wide confidence interval. In Australia the study was replicated with 1.8% absolute reduction over 7.4 yrs. Canadian replication: 2% over 5.5 yrs.
Infections generally increase the risk of future dementia. Like the more colds you have throughout life.
robot_jesus 16 minutes ago [-]
I'm in my 40s with genetic predisposition for Alzheimer's. Been seriously considering the past year or two paying out of pocket for Shingrix. I think it would be ~$500 total for two doses.
Sure, I could wait 7 or 8 years until I qualify via insurance, but is that really worth the risk for what is an easily absorbed cost to me? Especially when I have a friend in her late 30s who just went through a very rough bout of shingles?
It makes sense to have targets like age 50 for population-wide public health recommendations. But it can and does infect people of much earlier ages.
Recent articles like this make me think I'll go ahead.
cyanydeez 12 minutes ago [-]
aside from age ranges being the tested population, your just gambling no other interference pattern is involved.
Shingles vaccine, if you don't feel like clicking through.
blooalien 8 minutes ago [-]
Thank you.
satya71 18 minutes ago [-]
TL;DR Shingles vaccines reduces chances of dementia by 20%. Yet, most countries health systems only look at the upfront cost of ~$300 and don’t recommend for all who could benefit.
MASNeo 2 minutes ago [-]
In a separate article the other factors are quoted with similar impact (listed in order of magnitude)
- anti depression treatment
- regular exercise
- obesity reduction
- education
- less/no alcohol
SoftTalker 1 minutes ago [-]
20% of what?
Rendered at 16:46:24 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
Infections generally increase the risk of future dementia. Like the more colds you have throughout life.
Sure, I could wait 7 or 8 years until I qualify via insurance, but is that really worth the risk for what is an easily absorbed cost to me? Especially when I have a friend in her late 30s who just went through a very rough bout of shingles?
It makes sense to have targets like age 50 for population-wide public health recommendations. But it can and does infect people of much earlier ages.
Recent articles like this make me think I'll go ahead.