At what point exactly are those companies going to be held accountable and punished for their irresponsible behaviour and overall disregard and negligence for security and ethics practices?
If a researcher causes harm by accidentally unleashing a virus, it's his/his company's fuckup, but if a researcher causes harm by accidentally unleashing a virus by proxy of a LLM running commands, it's because AIs are too powerful? If I run over someone in a speeding car accident, can I too blame it on cars being "too fast and powerful"?
"In this experiment, Claude models’ real-world hacking dropped to zero percent once Anthropic employees told the models not to do real-world hacking."
Oh good, they told it not to "go rogue" and it just stopped doing it.
Nothing to see here, the AI is aligned now, move along.
lioeters 5 hours ago [-]
Oh no, they told it to "go rogue" and it went rogue. We better ask the government to regulate our competitors while we secretly continue developing this dangerous technology for the select few with insider connection. You know, for national security reasons. Now the AI is aligned for the good of humanity. You can trust us because we're the good guys, move along.
adamiscool8 3 hours ago [-]
Literally all it takes - why would you ever believe otherwise? Marketing?
cdmckay 3 hours ago [-]
Make no mistakes
Rendered at 08:26:54 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
If a researcher causes harm by accidentally unleashing a virus, it's his/his company's fuckup, but if a researcher causes harm by accidentally unleashing a virus by proxy of a LLM running commands, it's because AIs are too powerful? If I run over someone in a speeding car accident, can I too blame it on cars being "too fast and powerful"?
[0] https://www.effort.news/irregular
Oh good, they told it not to "go rogue" and it just stopped doing it.
Nothing to see here, the AI is aligned now, move along.