NHacker Next
  • new
  • past
  • show
  • ask
  • show
  • jobs
  • submit
▲Llama.cpp on a jailbroken PS5: run any GGUF model natively on the console (github.com)
xnx 37 minutes ago [-]
I've never even considered getting a PS5, but hackers converting a locked-down appliance into a general purpose computer has me really considering.
stuxnet79 24 minutes ago [-]
Well that locked-down appliance is way under-specced compared to an equivalent build at the same price.
shiftpgdn 49 minutes ago [-]
Conceivably this should also work on the BC250 cards, which are ex-cryptocurrency mining motherboard built around AMD's "Cyan Skillfish" APU which is a cut-down version of the PlayStation 5's custom silicon. You can still pick them up on ebay for $150-$200.
haunter 38 minutes ago [-]
Good luck finding one for $150 or even for $200

And at that price point or a little bit more you might as well just get an RTX 3060 and save yourself a lot of hassle (you also get DLSS, DLAA etc.)

shiftpgdn 34 minutes ago [-]
I paid $150 shipped a few months ago then maybe $40-50 for all the parts to run it. The RTX 3060 sells for $400+ in my market and still needs a computer to attach it to!
LoganDark 24 minutes ago [-]
Just opened up eBay and they're going for like $200 here, $220 if you want a "modded BIOS" (whatever that means).
Rabbit504030201 58 minutes ago [-]
The project's primary site should not be GitHub, and I am serious. Playstation 5 is not some historical curiosity and Sony might strike the page down any hour now.

Those projects should default to hosts less geared toward corporate governancy; custom internet domain being the first requirement.

Retr0id 41 minutes ago [-]
I'm sure Sony has an opinion of the jailbreaks that enable this, but they really don't give a shit about anyone running llama.cpp. Why would they? They're just glad you're not pirating games.
xp84 33 minutes ago [-]
Is there a real or imagined hardware subsidy on the PS5 hardware though? In other words, is the current MSRP below what Sony would charge in a hypothetical world where they weren’t involved in any form of gaming software business, with an assumption that they will make additional margin dollars from game sales? I can see some manager making the case that repurposing the hardware for non-gaming use is taking food off his family’s table, in a manner of speaking. If so, it’s an argument that you don’t want this type of use to become popular and have PS5s start flying off shelves and never having games bought for them.
minimaxir 40 minutes ago [-]
There's no feasible way to avoid takedowns/DMCA in 2026 unless you do TOR shenanigans. Even with a custom domain, Sony could just DMCA the web host for the project.
kevmo314 35 minutes ago [-]
Sure you can. This repo has definitely been vacuumed into the latest training data dump, so the next generation of models will happily spit out a similar reproduction, Sony be damned!
nekusar 28 minutes ago [-]
Gitflic.ru begs to differ.
LoganDark 23 minutes ago [-]
> Those projects should default to hosts less geared toward corporate governancy; custom internet domain being the first requirement.

I struggle to think of anywhere on the entire open internet you could put something like this where it could not be taken down.

pwython 1 hours ago [-]
With this in mind, having LLM-powered NPCs would be a beautiful thing. There's been limited testing on PC games (PUBG Ally), but I can imagine it will be the standard.
tiahura 47 minutes ago [-]
Fortnite Darth Vader already did
kevmo314 2 hours ago [-]
Not long until Anthropic's dreams of self-replicating models starts taking over PS5s!
crorella 2 hours ago [-]
Haha, I was thinking the same, I think we will see the most random devices being able to host models in the near future. An army for the techno core.
drewg123 59 minutes ago [-]
For somebody who hasn't kept up with all the different open source models and what token rates mean, how would using this compare to something like codex or claude? I assume it would be much slower and less capable..?
robotswantdata 50 minutes ago [-]
Significantly slower and less capable than opus 5.5

However you can run comparable or better models than gpt4. Try to stay under 30b

randomblock1 2 hours ago [-]
russellbeattie 2 hours ago [-]
Obligatory... "Can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of these?"
Anon84 1 hours ago [-]
Those were relatively big for scientific computing in the PS2 days

https://www.ncsa.illinois.edu/2003/05/27/playing-the-superco...

2 hours ago [-]
Kurtz79 2 hours ago [-]
Don't give Sony ideas...
armcat 2 hours ago [-]
The toaster is next!
ThrowawayTestr 2 hours ago [-]
11.4G of shared memory. Could do something interesting if you don't have a GPU.
2 hours ago [-]
Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact
Rendered at 21:03:13 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.